• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Adoptee Rights Law Center

Legal representation and advocacy for adoptees

  • Home
  • Latest
  • The OBC
    • Laws
    • Legislation
    • Maps
    • FAQ
  • Citizenship
    • Legislation
  • About
    • Contact

Last updated on December 26, 2018

What We Overlook

The “we” in this title is almost always exclusive, and it is obviously defined by those who speak the word. Most of the time—and this may be implicitly assumed within the context of adoptee rights—“we” is seen through the lens of white domestic adoptees. “We” does not often include adoptees of color or transracial and transnational adoptees, unless they are the “we” speaking. And while “we” as domestic white adopted persons may juggle a culture of adoption, we do not simultaneously juggle a transposed cultural identity and the deep issues that confront many other adoptees who are not white.

I have often overlooked what is meant by “we.” Part of that is because I am typically focused on one thing: the original birth certificate. And that focus involves petitioning courts on behalf of clients to get an OBC or working as part of state-based coalitions to change the law, whether in Texas or New York or elsewhere. In that work, in that necessary hyperfocus, I overlook a lot. Here is one simple example to understand what it means for me to “overlook,” though to be fair it may more accurately mean “to ignore.”

I assess and draft bills that will, I hope, ultimately make an adult adoptee’s original birth certificate available upon simple request. That should be a right, and I think most of “us” agree with that. In the very specific work of examining nitty gritty language of legislation, however, I’ve overlooked fixes and issues for “other” adoptees, namely intercountry adoptees. In Florida, for example, there may again be legislative efforts to restore an adoptee’s right to the OBC. If there is, it will likely address a single thing: the original birth certificate for adopted persons who are born in Florida. It will not address a separate issue: those born outside of the United States but who immigrated here as children to be readopted—i.e., intercountry adoptees whose US adoptions were later handled under Florida adoption law.

In representing ICAs, the legal issues I see are not primarily about the OBC, assuming one can even be located. They are about, at least legally in many of my cases, proving citizenship, seeking travel visas to their own countries of origin, obtaining a passport, any number of things that—more importantly today than in any other time in a very long time—require a person to prove a “chain of identity,” from born in one country to adopted and living in another. And the simple lack of adoption-related documents to demonstrate that specific chain of identity has become a real issue, not only because the lack of adequate documents can restrict travel or lead to denial of citizenship, but because suddenly an overly complicated set of laws—almost always created within the context of white domestic infant adoptees— make it ridiculously expensive and difficult to get what is required and what should be a right to have as a human: documents showing the full scope of your own identity. So, as bills are introduced in states to address an OBC for predominantly white domestic adoptees, we overlook other issues of “proof” of identity. For ICAs, that proof often involves decrees or certificates of adoption that legally link the identity of one heritage to another. In Florida, those records are sealed, and the language of the statute that seals them treats them like any other adoption:

After registering the certificate of foreign birth in the new name of the adoptee, the department shall place the adoption report or decree under seal, not to be broken except pursuant to court order.

This makes an essential document unavailable to an ICA except through a court order, and I’ve been having to petition courts repeatedly to get these documents, often required for proving citizenship, obtaining a passport, or proving just who someone is. It’s inane, and we as advocates have overlooked this issue as we strive for release solely of an OBC. To be just—and again this is just a simple example within all the complex issues of intercountry adoption—the phrase in this particular statute should be amended to be “not to be broken except pursuant to court order, upon written request by the adoptee if at least 18 years of age, or upon written request of the adopting parents if the adoptee is a minor.” Why “we” overlook that is not hard to figure out. We are not them. We is limited.

My job as a lawyer specifically requires me to represent my client’s best interest. All clients, no matter our different lived experiences. I do not have the lived experience of an intercountry adoptee, so I respond to questions from my clients and work to understand what is needed, at least legally. Foremost, this means I listen. That’s the lesson I cannot emphasize enough, both for me and for “we.” We, and you know who I mean by that, must pause before delivering a lecture a person has probably heard multiple times. We must stop and not be quick to assume that what “we” know peripherally is somehow unknown to others, especially to the “others” who live that life. Listen and do not assume. Then act when asked to act.

Overlooking what is meant by “we” has prompted me to work on a series of posts. I have informally named the series “The Internal Work of Adoptee Rights.” I hope to interview adoptees from all walks of life and all origins. I’m interested in guest posts and in generating comments here or on the posts and interviews as they are published. I’m specifically hoping to have guest posts and interviews from adoptees of color, former foster youth, transracial adoptees, LGBTQ adoptees, and intercountry adoptees. If that’s you, email me with a proposal. The idea is not to duplicate what is already being written or posted elsewhere (and there is a great deal out there when you look) but to make sure voices “we” do not normally hear are further amplified so that we are ultimately compelled to hear them.

In my world of adoption, I’m often surprisingly guided and inspired by two Marge Piercy poems. One is about knowing another person and the complications of true intimacy that may bring. The other is political, written in the context of feminist activism, but certainly resonant with any political action. I encourage you to read the full poem here, but the lines from “The low road” that I constantly find in my head are in the last stanza. I come back to them often, and I hope too that we can come to them as well.

It goes on one at a time,
it starts when you care
to act, it starts when you do
it again after they said no,
it starts when you say We
and know who you mean, and each
day you mean one more.

Filed Under: Essays, Latest News Tagged With: Adoptee Rights, Citizenship, Intercountry Adoptees

Gregory D. Luce

I am a Minnesota lawyer, DC-born adoptee, and the founder of Adoptee Rights Law Center PLLC. I've been practicing law in Minnesota state and federal courts since 1993. I also have a sense of humor.

Get Involved with Adoptees United Inc.

Logo of Adoptees United Inc.Did you find this post interesting? Then get involved nationally with Adoptees United Inc., a national tax-exempt non-profit organization dedicated to securing equality for all adult adopted people in the US. Find out more here, and join me and others in working for equality.

Did I Miss Something?

I work hard to get the laws and facts straight in every state---and to keep them regularly updated. If you see something that's not quite right or doesn't fit your experience, let me know with either a quick comment or an email.

 

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Lynelle says

    December 27, 2018 at 6:45 am

    Thankyou Gregory for helping raise awareness of what “we” intercountry adoptees always struggle with more compared to domestic and transracial adoptees. Being born in a foreign country and adopted out via our adoptive country and our birth country laws, makes extra complications for us to navigate in order to uncover our original identity. For some, like Indian intercountry adoptees adopted to areas of the USA with sealed records, it’s an impossible task because India also doesn’t support root searching or make it easy to access one’s original records. This area of legal rights to our original identity is a huge huge issue for intercountry adoptees and reflects the lack of international laws or legal experts to assist us.. Awesome to have someone as a legal professional who is trying to help! My wish is for an independent legal resource centre for all intercountry adoptees around the world. We have nowhere to turn when adoptive countries won’t give automatic citizenship, when deported, when trying to access our original identities particularly if our adoption was irregular or illegal.
    http://www.intercountryadopteevoices.com

    Reply
    • Gregory D. Luce says

      December 28, 2018 at 8:14 am

      That’s a great idea. I’m hoping I can be a part of something like that and am talking to a number of people about what can be done to shore up and develop more resources and advocacy.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Adoptee Rights Law Center

The Adoptee Rights Law Center PLLC is an adoptee-focused legal practice founded by Gregory Luce, a Minnesota lawyer and D.C.-born adoptee.

Contact Me

Legal representation limited to issues involving Minnesota law and federal immigration law.

Latest Posts

  • Why I Changed Hawaii’s Status
  • What Happens When You Question Adoption
  • Before You Start Spouting Off About Haiti, Amy Coney Barrett, and the ‘Beauty’ of Adoption
  • The Sham Promise of ‘Integrated Birth Certificates’
  • Naturalization Fee to Increase More than 80 Percent in October

Contact Info

Adoptee Rights Law Center PLLC
PO Box 19561
Minneapolis Minnesota 55419
T: (612) 221-3947
E: [email protected]

Legal representation limited to issues involving Minnesota law and federal immigration law.

The OBC: Numbers

9unrestricted
22compromised
20restricted
51View All

The OBC: Maps

Legislative Tracking

I also monitor federal legislation related to intercountry adoptees.

Footer

Recent Posts

  • Why I Changed Hawaii’s Status
  • What Happens When You Question Adoption
  • Before You Start Spouting Off About Haiti, Amy Coney Barrett, and the ‘Beauty’ of Adoption

Contact

Adoptee Rights Law Center PLLC
Gregory D. Luce
PO Box 19561
Minneapolis Minnesota 55419
T: (612) 221-3947
E: [email protected]

Legal representation limited to issues involving Minnesota law and federal immigration law.

Connect

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
  • YouTube

New York Adoptee Rights Coalition

Adoptee Rights Law Center is part of the New York Adoptee Rights Coalition, a group of organizations committed to enactment of unrestricted OBC access legislation in New York. Join Us

Copyright © 2021 · Adoptee Rights Law Center PLLC · Home · About · Contact